RiskMap 2016: Excitement over “People Power” in Africa will not continue in 2016
RiskMap highlights the most significant underlying trends in global risk and security, and provides a detailed view from the markets that will matter most in 2016
People power witnessed in 2014 and 2015, for example in changes of government in Burkina Faso and Nigeria, will be proved limited in 2016. A combination of elections, constitutional pressures and financial difficulties will test governments across the region, including in Chad, Uganda, Congo (Brazzaville), Angola and South Africa. Incumbents will however retain their hold on power. These are some of the key messages of RiskMap 2016, published today by global business risk consultancy Control Risks. RiskMap highlights the most significant underlying trends in global risk and security, and provides a detailed view from the markets that will matter most in 2016.
According to RiskMap 2016, entrenched elites continue to hold sway in many frontier markets in Africa and few countries nurture the pre-conditions for change driven by the masses, either through the ballot or mass mobilisation. Amid widespread currency weakness and low commodity prices, the outlook for 2016 looks less gloomy than might be anticipated. With economic downturn in their home market, Chinese companies will continue to look overseas for opportunities to sustain growth. East Africa will remain a key target for Chinese investment. RiskMap identifies Ethiopia as the key regional market to watch in 2016.
Daniel Heal, Senior Managing Director, Control Risks East Africa, comments:
“The changes we have seen in Burkina Faso and Nigeria reflected circumstances unique to each country. In both situations, the growing inter-connectivity of societies and access to communications – both themes of RiskMap 2015 – contributed to landmark political reconfigurations. But these factors alone were not sufficient to generate change. And they are unlikely to trigger change elsewhere in Africa.
“While we anticipate governments across the continent surviving pressures on them in 2016, there may be heightened volatility and tension during sensitive periods such as elections, and the political environments they shape are evolving. This requires investors to understand fully the drivers of change and their potential to impact the business environment, and to be prepared for alterations to posture and strategy.”
- Ethiopia – key country to watch: Ethiopia has recorded double-digit growth for the last decade. Opportunities exist in infrastructure, manufacturing, commercial farming, as well as mining, oil and gas.
- Uganda: President Yoweri Museveni is expected to win general elections due in February 2016, with opposition splits undermining the threat rivals pose. There is some risk of sustained and violent political protests ahead of the elections.
- Burundi: The political climate is likely to remain extremely volatile in 2016. President Pierre Nkurunziza and his entourage are reluctant to make political concessions and resume dialogue with the opposition, despite international pressure. The country sees frequent political assassinations, grenade attacks, unrest, as well as the gradual intensification of a rebellion in the north. Attempts to unseat Nkurunziza are likely to multiply.
- DRC: A scheduled presidential election in 2016 is likely to be delayed as President Joseph Kabila seeks to extend his term in office. A series of policy initiatives including decentralisation are thought to have been designed to derail elections, in which Kabila is constitutionally now allowed to stand. Kabila’s attempts to form a unity government overseeing a transition period until 2018 are denounced by the opposition. Growing political uncertainty, rising tensions, and increasing unrest characterise next year
- Nigeria: President Muhammadu Buhari’s government and policy directions will continue to take shape after his election victory in March 2015. He and his cabinet, recognising the urgency of enacting reforms that will help Nigeria cope with lower revenue from oil sales, will prioritise work on reshaping the national oil company and taking more control over how it uses its income. His administration, seeking to avoid recession by passing an expansionary budget, is expected to target large-scale spending on building essential infrastructure. Reforms will however be slowed and made more difficult by a troubling fiscal situation.
- Burkina Faso: After a contested transition period in 2015, Roch Marc Christian Kaboré’s election as president in a peaceful poll will boost prospects for stability and economic growth. However, various challenges await the new president in 2016: from reforming a political system that has entrenched corruption for nearly three decades, to restoring investor confidence in the mining sector and curbing the growing threat of Islamist militancy along Burkina Faso’s northern borders.
- Angola’s political system is under strain from worsening socio-economic conditions and rising tension over President Eduardo José dos Santos’s eventual succession. This will undoubtedly influence the tug-of-war within the ruling People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) over the presidential succession. But there seems to be limited appetite and capability among the masses to challenge the MPLA’s supremacy.
- In Zimbabwe, the perceived weakness of the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) – is likely to prompt increasingly vocal opposition to the government. Political battles will have worrying consequences for business.
- South Africa: The ANC’s political dominance will be severely tested in South Africa’s municipal elections with a very real possibility of it losing its majority in a number of key urban centres. The party’s centre of influence has already been pulled towards its more populist extremes as it attempts to counter the rise in militant movements such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). A strong municipal election performance by such groups will have concerning implications for how the ANC responds to economic challenges, particularly regarding fiscal and labour policies.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Control Risks Group Holdings Ltd.
For the map graphic or for further information please contact:
Marketing Director Europe & Africa
+49 30 533 288 55
+49 173 619 54 66
Notes to Editors:
About Control Risks
Control Risks (www.ControlRisks.com) is a global risk consultancy specialising in political, security and integrity risk. The company enables its clients to understand and manage the risks of operating in complex or hostile environments. Through a unique combination of services, wide geographical reach and by adopting a close partnership approach with clients, Control Risks helps organisations effectively solve their problems and realise new opportunities across the world.
Annex: Risk rating changes
- Burkina Faso: Political risk from HIGH to MEDIUM
- Burundi: Political risk from HIGH to EXTREME
- Madagascar: Political risk from HIGH to MEDIUM
- Mali: Political risk from HIGH to MEDIUM
- Senegal: Political risk from MEDIUM to LOW
- Zambia: Security risk from LOW to MEDIUM
- Aruba: Political risk from LOW to INSIGNIFICANT
- Belize: Political risk from LOW to MEDIUM
- Bonaire: Political risk and security risk from LOW to INSIGNIFICANT
- Brazil: Security risk from MEDIUM to HIGH in Pará state, metropolitan areas of Maceió, Fortaleza, Salvador
- Chile: Security risk from LOW to MEDIUM in Bío Bío, La Araucanía, Los Ríos
- Costa Rica: Political and security risk from LOW to MEDIUM
- Mexico: Security risk from MEDIUM to HIGH in Baja California, Coahuila down to MEDIUM
- Sint Maarten: Political risk from LOW to INSIGNIFICANT
- Afghanistan: Security risk HIGH in Samangan and Bamian provinces
- Malaysia: Political risk from LOW to MEDIUM
- Pakistan: Political and security risk from HIGH to EXTREME in FATA, western Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa
- Sri Lanka: Political risk down to MEDIUM in whole country
- Vanuatu: Political risk from LOW to MEDIUM
- Denmark: Security risk from INSIGNIFICANT to LOW
- France: Security risk down to LOW in urban areas
- Moldova: Political risk from MEDIUM to HIGH
- Sweden: Security risk from INSIGNIFICANT to LOW
- Turkey: Larger areas of HIGH security risk
Middle East and North Africa:
- Egypt: Security risk from HIGH to EXTREME in North Sinai
- Libya: Security risk from HIGH to EXTREME; HIGH in Misrata, Murqub, Tripoli, Jafara, Zawiya, Nuqat al-Khams, Jabal al-Gharbi, Nalut
- Oman: Political risk from MEDIUM to LOW
- Saudi Arabia: Political risk from LOW to MEDIUM
- Tunisia: Security risk MEDIUM in the whole country